📰 We can’t abolish America’s largest teachers union. But Congress can do something else
The article discusses the National Education Association (NEA) and its political power, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The NEA is criticized for promoting progressive politics and prioritizing its own interests over education. The NEA’s annual convention revealed controversial resolutions, including attacks on President Trump and questionable stances on various social issues. The union’s report highlighted its activities, which focused more on political activism than student learning. Efforts are being made to hold the NEA more accountable and less partisan through legislation like the STUDENT Act.
In summary, the NEA’s actions and priorities have come under scrutiny, with concerns raised about its influence on public education and its focus on political agendas over student learning. The union’s controversial resolutions and activities have sparked criticism and calls for accountability. Efforts are being made through legislation like the STUDENT Act to address the NEA’s perceived shortcomings and ensure a more balanced approach to education.
📰 High-speed rail isn’t California’s only expensive boondoggle
California Governor Gavin Newsom is suing the Trump administration for withdrawing $4 billion in federal funding for the high-speed rail project, revealing the state’s fiscal challenges. Despite boasting about California’s economy, the state also faces the highest real poverty rate and a projected budget deficit of up to $20 billion. The high-speed rail project, initially estimated to cost $40 billion, now has a projected cost of $128 billion with no track laid as of June. The article highlights bureaucratic inefficiencies in California, such as complex environmental regulations leading to landfill closures and mismanagement of essential services like fire hydrants and reservoirs in Los Angeles. Additionally, the article discusses how California’s Medicaid reimbursement scheme has squeezed private providers and allowed the state to mask its unfunded pension obligations. Governor Newsom’s lawsuit over the train funds is seen as more about image than infrastructure, as he navigates political pressures and fiscal challenges in the state.
📰 What James Carville doesn’t get about voter priorities
In a recent article in the New York Times, Democratic strategist James Carville advised Democrats to unite around a message focused on repealing President Trump’s agenda for the 2026 midterms. However, the article criticizes Carville’s narrow focus on resistance, arguing that Democrats need a more comprehensive agenda beyond just opposing Trump. The piece highlights the lack of specific policy proposals from Democrats and calls for a new economic plan that balances fiscal responsibility with protecting social programs. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing immigration issues, securing the border, and offering a pathway to citizenship for legal migrants and Dreamers. The article warns that simply resisting Trump may not be enough for Democrats to win back the White House in 2028, stressing the need for a substantive agenda that addresses voters’ concerns about the economy, public safety, government efficiency, and border security.
📰 BOZELL, GRAHAM: Trump successfully defunds NPR and PBS and he’s just getting started
Conservatives have successfully removed over a billion dollars in taxpayer funding from NPR and PBS, marking a significant shift in government support for media organizations. This move challenges the long-standing practice of using public funds to support media outlets that exhibit political bias. The defunding effort aims to make NPR and PBS more accountable and competitive by forcing them to reevaluate their programming and business models. The decision has sparked concerns among some conservatives that the networks may turn to wealthy progressive donors for support, potentially deepening their bias. However, the move signals a broader shift away from unaccountable taxpayer subsidies for partisan media and towards a more transparent media landscape.
📰 GREGG JARRETT: Newly declassified documents destroy Russian collusion hoax
The article discusses how lies and deceit marked Barack Obama’s presidency, particularly regarding the false narrative of Donald Trump colluding with Russia in the 2016 election. The narrative was based on a phony dossier commissioned by Hillary Clinton and peddled by Obama’s national security team. Tulsi Gabbard accused Obama, Brennan, and others of engineering false intelligence to promote the Russia collusion narrative. Newly declassified documents revealed that the intelligence assessment was manipulated to fit the collusion narrative, despite contradicting evidence. The House Intelligence report detailed how Russian intelligence possessed damaging information on Hillary Clinton, raising concerns among Obama and Democrat Party leaders. Gabbard sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department, implicating Obama in leading the manufacturing of the false intelligence assessment.
0개의 댓글