📰 It’s time for Newsom to pull the brake on California’s $128 billion ghost train
The article discusses the ongoing issues with California’s high-speed rail project, which has faced delays, budget overruns, and political controversies. Despite the federal government withdrawing $4 billion in funding, the state continues to support the project, emphasizing job creation over practicality. Originally envisioned as a transformative transportation system connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles, the project has now been scaled back to a partial rail segment between Merced and Bakersfield. Critics argue that the high-speed rail project has become a taxpayer-funded monument to mismanagement, with costs ballooning to $128 billion. The article suggests alternative uses for the funds, such as providing every Californian with a roundtrip journey to Tokyo and a stay at the Ritz-Carlton, highlighting the extravagant nature of the project in comparison.
📰 In Colorado, state Attorney General Phil Weiser is the lawbreaker, not local deputies
The article discusses a lawsuit filed against a Mesa County Deputy Sheriff in Colorado for sharing information about an illegal alien with federal authorities. The state law in question prohibits sharing information about aliens with federal immigration authorities, which violates federal law. The Deputy Sheriff and his colleagues were disciplined for cooperating with federal immigration agents as part of a drug task force. The article criticizes Colorado’s sanctuary law for allowing criminal illegal aliens to remain in communities, citing examples of dangerous criminals not being handed over to ICE authorities. The author argues that law enforcement officers like Deputy Sheriff Zwink should be commended for assisting in removing illegal aliens from the country, rather than disciplined for following federal law.
📰 MORNING GLORY: Trump needs to clean house at environmental agencies abusing property rights
The article discusses the negative impact of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on farmers, ranchers, and landowners due to regulations by various government agencies like the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). President Trump is urged to issue executive orders to remove certain species from the ESA list based on questionable criteria, compensate landowners for the impact of ESA listings on their property, and downsize the USFWS and NOAA to focus on protecting genuinely endangered species. The article suggests that the ESA has been misused to hinder development rather than protect species, and calls for a more merit-based approach within these agencies. It also highlights the need for immediate compensation to landowners for any loss of economic value due to ESA regulations, as mandated by the Fifth Amendment.
📰 Low-rise jeans, high returns: How Sydney Sweeney is helping American Eagle stock fly
Sydney Sweeney’s collaboration with American Eagle to promote low-rise jeans was a strategic business move that resonated with consumers and revitalized the brand’s image. The ad campaign tapped into nostalgia for Y2K fashion while promoting body positivity, appealing to both Gen Z and Millennials. American Eagle, facing a decline in market share and stock price, needed a change, and Sweeney’s endorsement provided a much-needed boost. The success of the campaign was evident in the stock price increase and positive reception from both consumers and investors. By embracing controversy and leveraging Sweeney’s relatable persona, American Eagle created a marketing strategy that generated buzz and potential for long-term success.
📰 GREGG JARRETT: Who could be indicted by a grand jury in the Russia collusion hoax?
The article discusses the unraveling of the alleged Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy and the potential legal consequences for those involved. It highlights the roles of key figures such as John Brennan, James Comey, and James Clapper in the investigation known as “Crossfire Hurricane.” The article suggests that there was a deliberate effort to falsely accuse Trump of collusion, orchestrated by individuals within the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s campaign. It also touches on potential crimes such as perjury, making false statements, and conspiracy in relation to the handling of the collusion narrative. The article speculates on potential legal proceedings, including grand jury investigations and the possibility of invoking the Fifth Amendment. It also mentions the immunity enjoyed by former President Barack Obama and the legal complexities surrounding his involvement in the alleged conspiracy.
In summary, the article delves into the alleged conspiracy to frame Trump for collusion, implicating key figures from the Obama administration and Clinton’s campaign. It discusses potential crimes committed in the process, such as perjury and making false statements. The article speculates on legal proceedings, including grand jury investigations and the possibility of witnesses invoking the Fifth Amendment. It also touches on the immunity enjoyed by former President Obama and the legal complexities surrounding his involvement in the alleged conspiracy.
0개의 댓글